But i can if I am not lazy got trough your games and catologize your oponents
It doesnt make sense to me to design that the list oponents open, but the sat how many not
Well, I can say one thing for certain: If this problem continues I will not shy away from publishing my own Favorite opponents list, where the top places are all occupied by people hundreds of points higher than me. These people stopped being problematic, so I won't post it now, but I'm going to reserve that right for later.
I don't know about that. I've lost games against players that were way better rated than me but they didn't cost me many points and didn't won them much either. 🤔
Apparently, resigning is punished more than being checkmated.
> ❝@COArSe_D1RTxxx A 400-point rating difference means the higher-rated player is 10 times as good as the lower-rated player. ❞
> Could you explain how you got to that conclusion please?
This is how the Glicko-1 system and the related Glicko-2 system are defined. Glicko-1 provides a formula for determining expected outcome:
where 𝑔 is given by:
The formula depends on 𝑔 of the geometric mean of the players' rating deviations. We'll assume they're both zero (meaning we know the players' strengths exactly). 𝑔(0) is 1, so our formula simplifies to:
This formula is for probability, but we want odds (1/2 vs. 1:1). Converting, we get that the odds toward player 𝑗 beating player 𝑖 are:
or that player 𝑗 is 10× better than player 𝑖 for every 400 points in difference between the two.
Lichess and Lishogi use Glicko-2 and not Glicko-1, but Glicko-2 is simply an update to the way scores are calculated after a game, so the fundamentals about ratings are shared between the two.
> I don't know about that. I've lost games against players that were way better rated than me but they didn't cost me many points and didn't won them much either. 🤔
>
> Apparently, resigning is punished more than being checkmated.
No.
You can't post in the forums yet. Play some games!